Albright to Urge Speedier Mideast Talks on Her Visit
- Share via
WASHINGTON — After seven months of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright is now prepared to commit to accelerated, high-profile Mideast peace talks aimed at concluding a final deal between Israel and the Palestinians up to a year earlier than the May 1999 target, according to U.S. officials.
Albright will propose speeding up both the pace and the agenda when she makes her first trip to the region as secretary of State at the end of the month. Her initial goal will be to set up mechanisms for concluding the complex process launched in 1993, officials said.
The idea of accelerating the negotiations was publicly proposed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last October, although it was originally broached by U.S. officials concerned that the peace process was getting bogged down.
“It became clear to us that either we do it the hard way--negotiating foot by foot--or we can go to the endgame that includes the big final issues as well as stages of the withdrawal” still at issue in the current phase of talks, a senior U.S. official said.
The Palestinians have been reluctant to leap to the “permanent status” talks for fear of appearing to cave in to Netanyahu and of losing leverage over the amount of land turned over to them in the West Bank during the two remaining Israeli troop withdrawals. They also have feared that Israel might use accelerated talks to avoid fulfilling obligations remaining under existing peace deals. But they now appear to agree.
“They recognize it’s in their interest to get it done early,” the U.S. official said. “The more time that passes, the greater the dangers on a lot of fronts.”
Among the dangers are more terrorist attacks--which harden official and private Israeli positions--and further disillusionment among Palestinians about the slow pace of reaping peace dividends in the form of better living standards, more jobs and self-determination.
Palestinians “say they don’t like the status quo. We say, fine, then we can offer change faster,” the official added. “We think they’re on board.”
Saeb Erekat, the Palestinians’ chief negotiator with Israel, said he is not averse to accelerating the talks on the toughest issues that divide the two sides. “But these talks should be in parallel with implementing the existing agreements,” he said.
The U.S. and Israeli proposals to accelerate the talks differ. Netanyahu proposed moving directly to talks entailing the status of Palestinian statehood, Jerusalem, Israeli settlements and Palestinian refugees. Albright is proposing consolidation of the interim issues, specifically Israeli troop withdrawals from additional territory in the West Bank and final settlement issues.
“We are not implying that the parties should forgo implementation of other aspects of the agreements they’ve already reached,” said State Department spokesman Jamie Rubin. “We’re not trying to leave behind the requirement for steps to be taken in areas like the [Palestinian] seaport, airport, safe passage [between Gaza and the West Bank] and further redeployment” of Israeli troops.
A specific timetable for accelerated talks is up to the two sides, Clinton administration sources said. Netanyahu originally suggested that the talks should be concluded within six months. Although U.S. officials stressed that they have no formula, they said that six to nine months is a reasonable goal.
“Two years is too long to hold out as a hope for the people to see, to have the understanding that there is an end point to this process,” Rubin said.
To get the process going again, senior U.S. mediator Dennis B. Ross, who this weekend begins talks in Jerusalem with each side, will attempt to persuade Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat to cooperate with Israel on three specific security issues: providing lists of people believed to be involved in anti-Israeli and extremist activities, swapping general information on security concerns and ending the “revolving door” policy of detaining and then releasing extremist suspects.
Palestinian officials, for example, have not provided Israel with names of those arrested in either the West Bank or Gaza, U.S. officials said. “They don’t do the normal things that happen when two intelligence organizations meet,” a well-placed American official said.
The administration is particularly frustrated with Arafat. The Palestinian leader was specifically and repeatedly warned by senior U.S., Jordanian and Egyptian officials in the weeks before the deadly July double-suicide bombing that killed 13 Israelis that he was “playing with fire that was going to blow up in his face,” an administration official said.
Since the bombing, U.S. officials have repeatedly asked Arafat and his security chiefs to move forcefully against the infrastructure of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, militant Islamic groups opposed to the peace accords with Israel--as he did after a series of deadly attacks in 1996. “We’re asking him to do what he did before--arrest the leaders, go after the money and support networks, and confiscate weapons,” one official said. “He hasn’t done it.”
U.S. officials acknowledged the political and psychological difficulties for Arafat of ordering information on his own people turned over to Israel--and his fear of being compared to Antoine Lahad, who heads the South Lebanon Army, an Israeli-financed militia that operates inside Israel’s self-declared security zone in southern Lebanon.
The administration now hopes that the prospect of Albright’s intervention to win political compromise--and sooner rather than later--will persuade Arafat to cooperate. But he needs to act swiftly and tangibly.
Wright reported from Washington, Trounson from Jerusalem.
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.