Guam Crash
- Share via
It seems like an extreme understatement for NTSB investigators to say that the low-altitude warning system “could have made a difference” if it had been operating properly (Aug. 11). In my view, it would be more accurate to say that it probably would have prevented the tragedy.
I was appalled when I learned that the ground-slope transmitter had been out of service for two weeks before the crash. Now I’m utterly in shock over the revelation that two key navigational aids were not operating.
I understand that it is considered to be the pilot’s responsibility to safely land the aircraft. But ask yourself why airports have all of these ground-based navigational tools. Are they truly merely helpful, or are they essential? I would argue that, to safely land at a relatively small airport, a 747 pilot needs all the help he or she can get.
CARY A. PETZEL
Yucca Valley
More to Read
Sign up for The Wild
We’ll help you find the best places to hike, bike and run, as well as the perfect silent spots for meditation and yoga.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.